Tuesday, February 27, 2007

RIDDLERS



DO THESE MEAN SOMETHING OR JUST APPEAR TO MEAN SOMETHING? IS THERE A DIFFERENCE? IF SO, WHAT IS IT?

4 Comments:

Blogger CARNAL TORPOR said...

They mean what they are, but they imply that which cannot be!

5:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

BUT DOES THAT NOT HOLD TRUE FOR ALL SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE? WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO IMPLY? HOW IS MEANING CHANGE AS IT IS OBJECTIFIED?

6:10 PM  
Blogger CARNAL TORPOR said...

Perhaps true meaning cannot be modulated by any symbol, it can be fragmented and so extracted as an experience, but True meaning cannot be removed or changed from it's primordial ontological state?

1:15 PM  
Blogger CARNAL TORPOR said...

MEANING DOES NOT EXIST IN AN OBJECTIVE STATE. IN ORDER FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND ME, INCLUDING THESE WORDS, YOU WOULD HAVE TO BECOME ME AND HAVE LIVED MY HISTORY AND POSESS MY CELLS. TECHNOLOGY HAS NOT ACHIEVED THIS LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION YET. UNTIL THEN, THIS RANDOM COLLECTION OF GLYPHS AND SPACES WILL HAVE TO TRICK YOU INTO THINKING THAT WE HAVE ANY CLUE WHAT WE MEAN.

9:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home